{"id":365,"date":"2023-08-02T12:47:42","date_gmt":"2023-08-02T12:47:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/?p=365"},"modified":"2023-08-02T12:47:44","modified_gmt":"2023-08-02T12:47:44","slug":"sapiens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/reads\/sapiens\/","title":{"rendered":"Sapiens\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Excerpts from the book of Yuval Noah Harari<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

That spectacular leap from the middle to the top had enormous consequences. Other animals at the top of the pyramid, such as lions and sharks, evolved into that position very gradually, over millions of years. This enabled the ecosystem to develop checks and balances that prevent lions and sharks from wreaking too much havoc. As lions became deadlier, so gazelles evolved to run faster, hyenas to cooperate better, and rhinoceroses to be more bad-tempered. In contrast, humankind ascended to the top so quickly that the ecosystem was not given time to adjust.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

When humans domesticated fire, they gained control of an obedient and potentially limitless force.<\/mark> Unlike eagles, humans could choose when and where to ignite a flame, and they were able to exploit fire for any number of tasks. Most importantly, the power of fire was not limited by the form, structure or strength of the human body. A single woman with a flint or fire stick could burn down an entire forest in a matter of hours. The domestication of fire was a sign of things to come.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

According to this theory Homo sapiens is primarily a social animal. Social cooperation is our key for survival and reproduction. <\/mark>It is not enough for individual men and women to know the whereabouts of lions and bison. It\u2019s much more important for them to know who in their band hates whom, who is sleeping with whom, who is honest, and who is a cheat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Yet the truly unique feature of our language is not its ability to transmit information about men and lions. Rather, it\u2019s the ability to transmit information about things that do not exist at all.<\/mark> As far as we know, only Sapiens can talk about entire kinds of entities that they have never seen, touched or smelled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

How did Homo sapiens manage to cross this critical threshold, eventually founding cities comprising tens of thousands of inhabitants and empires ruling hundreds of millions? The secret was probably the appearance of fiction. Large numbers of strangers can cooperate successfully by believing in common myths.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Telling effective stories is not easy. The difficulty lies not in telling the story, but in convincing everyone else to believe it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Why, for example, do people gorge on high-calorie food that is doing little good to their bodies? Today\u2019s affluent societies are in the throes of a plague of obesity, which is rapidly spreading to developing countries. It\u2019s a puzzle why we binge on the sweetest and greasiest food we can find, until we consider the eating habits of our forager forebears. In the savannahs and forests they inhabited, high-calorie sweets were extremely rare and food in general was in short supply. A typical forager 30,000 years ago had access to only one type of sweet food \u2013 ripe fruit. If a Stone Age woman came across a tree groaning with figs, the most sensible thing to do was to eat as many of them as she could on the spot, before the local baboon band picked the tree bare. The instinct to gorge on high-calorie food was hard-wired into our genes.<\/mark> Today we may be living in high-rise apartments with over-stuffed refrigerators, but our DNA still thinks we are in the savannah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

What do you really need to know in order to get by as a computer engineer, an insurance agent, a history teacher or a factory worker? You need to know a lot about your own tiny field of expertise, but for the vast majority of life\u2019s necessities you rely blindly on the help of other experts, whose own knowledge is also limited to a tiny field of expertise. The human collective knows far more today than did the ancient bands. But at the individual level, ancient foragers were the most knowledgeable and skilful people in history.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Scholars tend to ask only those questions that they can reasonably expect to answer. Without the discovery of as yet unavailable research tools, we will probably never know what the ancient foragers believed or what political dramas they experienced. Yet it is vital to ask questions for which no answers are available, otherwise we might be tempted to dismiss 60,000 of 70,000 years of human history with the excuse that \u2018the people who lived back then did nothing of importance\u2019.<\/mark> The truth is that they did a lot of important things<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

The Agricultural Revolution was history\u2019s biggest fraud. Who was responsible? Neither kings, nor priests, nor merchants. The culprits were a handful of plant species, including wheat, rice and potatoes. These plants domesticated Homo sapiens, rather than vice versa.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

The pursuit of an easier life resulted in much hardship, and not for the last time. It happens to us today. How many young college graduates have taken demanding jobs in high-powered firms, vowing that they will work hard to earn money that will enable them to retire and pursue their real interests when they are thirty-five? But by the time they reach that age, they have large mortgages, children to school, houses in the suburbs that necessitate at least two cars per family, and a sense that life is not worth living without really good wine and expensive holidays abroad.<\/mark> What are they supposed to do, go back to digging up roots? No, they double their efforts and keep slaving away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

One of history\u2019s few iron laws is that luxuries tend to become necessities and to spawn new obligations. Once people get used to a certain luxury, they take it for granted. Then they begin to count on it. Finally they reach a point where they can\u2019t live without it. Let\u2019s take another familiar example from our own time. Over the last few decades, we have invented countless time-saving devices that are supposed to make life more relaxed \u2013 washing machines, vacuum cleaners, dishwashers, telephones, mobile phones, computers, email. Previously it took a lot of work to write a letter, address and stamp an envelope, and take it to the mailbox. It took days or weeks, maybe even months, to get a reply. Nowadays I can dash off an email, send it halfway around the globe, and (if my addressee is online) receive a reply a minute later. I\u2019ve saved all that trouble and time, but do I live a more relaxed life?<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

How do you cause people to believe in an imagined order such as Christianity, democracy or capitalism? First, you never admit that the order is imagined. You always insist that the order sustaining society is an objective reality created by the great gods or by the laws of nature.<\/mark> People are unequal, not because Hammurabi said so, but because Enlil and Marduk decreed it. People are equal, not because Thomas Jefferson said so, but because God created them that way. Free markets are the best economic system, not because Adam Smith said so, but because these are the immutable laws of nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

UNDERSTANDING HUMAN HISTORY IN THE millennia following the Agricultural Revolution boils down to a single question: how did humans organise themselves in mass-cooperation networks, when they lacked the biological instincts necessary to sustain such networks? The short answer is that humans created imagined orders and devised scripts. These two inventions filled the gaps left by our biological inheritance.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

One hierarchy, however, has been of supreme importance in all known human societies: the hierarchy of gender. People everywhere have divided themselves into men and women.<\/mark> And almost everywhere men have got the better deal, at least since the Agricultural Revolution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

How can we distinguish what is biologically determined from what people merely try to justify through biological myths? A good rule of thumb is \u2018Biology enables, Culture forbids.<\/mark>\u2019 Biology is willing to tolerate a very wide spectrum of possibilities. It\u2019s culture that obliges people to realise some possibilities while forbidding others. Biology enables women to have children \u2013 some cultures oblige women to realise this possibility. Biology enables men to enjoy sex with one another \u2013 some cultures forbid them to realise this possibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

If patriarchy in Afro-Asia resulted from some chance occurrence, why were the Aztecs and Incas patriarchal? It is far more likely that even though the precise definition of \u2018man\u2019 and \u2018woman\u2019 varies between cultures, there is some universal biological reason why almost all cultures valued manhood over womanhood. We do not know what this reason is. There are plenty of theories, none of them convincing.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

The most common theory points to the fact that men are stronger than women, and that they have used their greater physical power to force women into submission. A more subtle version of this claim argues that their strength allows men to monopolise tasks that demand hard manual labour, such as ploughing and harvesting. This gives them control of food production, which in turn translates into political clout.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are two problems with this emphasis on muscle power. First, the statement that men are stronger than women\u2019 is true only on average, and only with regard to certain types of strength. Women are generally more resistant to hunger, disease and fatigue than men. There are also many women who can run faster and lift heavier weights than many men.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In fact, human history shows that there is often an inverse relation between physical prowess and social power. In most societies, it\u2019s the lower classes who do the manual labour. This may reflect Homo sapiens position in the food chain. If all that counted were raw physical abilities, Sapiens would have found themselves on a middle rung of the ladder<\/mark>. But their mental and social skills placed them at the top. It is therefore only natural that the chain of power within the species will also be determined by mental and social abilities more than by brute force. It is therefore hard to believe that the most influential and most stable social hierarchy in history is founded on men\u2019s ability physically to coerce women.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Another theory explains that masculine dominance results not from strength but from aggression. Millions of years of evolution have made men far more violent than women. Women can match men as far as hatred, greed and abuse are concerned, but when push comes to shove, the theory goes, men are more willing to engage in raw physical violence.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

We still talk a lot about \u2018authentic\u2019 cultures, but if by authentic\u2019 we mean something that developed independently, and that consists of ancient local traditions free of external influences, then there are no authentic cultures left on earth.<\/mark> Over the last few centuries, all cultures were changed almost beyond recognition by a flood of global influences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

In fact, monotheism, as it has played out in history, is a kaleidoscope of monotheist, dualist, polytheist and animist legacies, jumbling together under a single divine umbrella. The average Christian believes in the monotheist God, but also in the dualist Devil, in polytheist saints, and in animist ghosts. Scholars of religion have a name for this simultaneous avowal of different and even contradictory ideas and the combination of rituals and practices taken from different sources. It\u2019s called syncretism. Syncretism might, in fact, be the single great world religion.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Gautama\u2019s insight was that no matter what the mind experiences, it usually reacts with craving, and craving always involves dissatisfaction.<\/mark> When the mind experiences something distasteful it craves to be rid of the irritation. When the mind experiences something pleasant, it craves that the pleasure will remain and will intensify. Therefore, the mind is always dissatisfied and restless. This is very clear when we experience unpleasant things, such as pain. As long as the pain continues, we are dissatisfied and do all we can to avoid it. Yet even when we experience pleasant things we are never content.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

According to Buddhist tradition, Gautama himself attained nirvana and was fully liberated from suffering. Henceforth he was known as \u2018Buddha\u2019, which means \u2018The Enlightened One\u2019. Buddha spent the rest of his life explaining his discoveries to others so that everyone could be freed from suffering. He encapsulated his teachings in a single law: suffering arises from craving; the only way to be fully liberated from suffering is to be fully liberated from craving; and the only way to be liberated from craving is to train the mind to experience reality as it is.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Religion is a system of human norms and values that is founded on belief in a superhuman order. The theory of relativity is not a religion, because (at least so far) there are no human norms and values that are founded on it. Football is not a religion because nobody argues that its rules reflect superhuman edicts. Islam, Buddhism and Communism are all religions, because all are systems of human norms and values that are founded on belief in a superhuman order.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some readers may feel very uncomfortable with this line of reasoning. If it makes you feel better, you are free to go on calling Communism an ideology rather than a religion. It makes no difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Historians can speculate, but not provide any definitive answer. They can describe how Christianity took over the Roman Empire, but they cannot explain why this particular possibility was realised.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

History cannot be explained deterministically and it cannot be predicted because it is chaotic. So many forces are at work and their interactions are so complex that extremely small variations in the strength of the forces and the way they interact produce huge differences in outcomes. Not only that, but history is what is called a \u2018level two\u2019 chaotic system. <\/mark>Chaotic systems come in two shapes. Level one chaos is chaos that does not react to predictions about it. The weather, for example, is a level one chaotic system. Though it is influenced by myriad factors, we can build computer models that take more and more of them into consideration, and produce better and better weather forecasts. Level two chaos is chaos that reacts to predictions about it, and therefore can never be predicted accurately<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

So why study history? Unlike physics or economics, history is not a means for making accurate predictions. We study history not to know the future but to widen our horizons, to understand that our present situation is neither natural nor inevitable, and that we consequently have many more possibilities before us than we imagine. <\/mark>For example, studying how Europeans came to dominate Africans enables us to realise that there is nothing natural or inevitable about the racial hierarchy, and that the world might well be arranged differently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

In short, scientific research can flourish only in alliance with some religion or ideology. The ideology justifies the costs of the research.<\/mark> In exchange, the ideology influences the scientific agenda and determines what to do with the discoveries. Hence in order to comprehend how humankind has reached Alamogordo and the moon \u2013 rather than any number of alternative destinations \u2013 it is not enough to survey the achievements of physicists, biologists and sociologists. We have to take into account the ideological, political and economic forces that shaped physics, biology and sociology, pushing them in certain directions while neglecting others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

What enables banks \u2013 and the entire economy \u2013 to survive and flourish is our trust in the future. This trust is the sole backing for most of the money in the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

The secret of Dutch success was credit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

This is why today a country\u2019s credit rating is far more important to its economic well-being than are its natural resources<\/mark>. Credit ratings indicate the probability that a country will pay its debts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An oil-rich country cursed with a despotic government, endemic warfare and a corrupt judicial system will usually receive a low credit rating. As a result, it is likely to remain relatively poor since it will not be able to raise the necessary capital to make the most of its oil bounty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A country devoid of natural resources, but which enjoys peace, a fair judicial system and a free government is likely to receive a high credit rating. As such, it may be able to raise enough cheap capital to support a good education system and foster a flourishing high-tech industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

But in its extreme form, belief in the free market is as na\u00efve as belief in Santa Claus. There simply is no such thing as a market free of all political bias. <\/mark>The most important economic resource is trust in the future, and this resource is constantly threatened by thieves and charlatans. Markets by themselves offer no protection against fraud, theft and violence. It is the job of political systems to ensure trust by legislating sanctions against cheats and to establish and support police forces, courts and jails which will enforce the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Most people don\u2019t appreciate just how peaceful an era we live in<\/mark>. None of us was alive a thousand years ago, so we easily forget how much more violent the world used to be. And as wars become more rare they attract more attention. Many more people think about the wars raging today in Afghanistan and Iraq than about the peace in which most Brazilians and Indians live.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

It turns out that in the year following the 9\/11 attacks, despite all the talk of terrorism and war, the average person was more likely to kill himself than to be killed by a terrorist, a soldier or a drug dealer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Compare a medieval French peasant to a modern Parisian banker. The peasant lived in an unheated mud hut overlooking the local pigsty, while the banker goes home to a splendid penthouse with all the latest technological gadgets and a view to the Champs-Elys\u00e9es. Intuitively, we would expect the banker to be much happier than the peasant. However, mud huts, penthouses and the Champs-Elys\u00e9es don\u2019t really determine our mood. Serotonin does.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the medieval peasant completed the construction of his mud hut, his brain neurons secreted serotonin, bringing it up to level X. When in 2014 the banker made the last payment on his wonderful penthouse, brain neurons secreted a similar amount of serotonin, bringing it up to a similar level X. It makes no difference to the brain that the penthouse is far more comfortable than the mud hut. The only thing that matters is that at present the level of serotonin is X. Consequently the banker would not be one iota happier than his great-great-great-grandfather, the poor medieval peasant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

For thousands of years, philosophers, thinkers and prophets have besmirched money and called it the root of all evil. Be that as it may, money is also the apogee of human tolerance. Money is more open-minded than language, state laws, cultural codes, religious beliefs and social habits. Money is the only trust system created by humans that can bridge almost any cultural gap, and that does not discriminate on the basis of religion, gender, race, age or sexual orientation. Thanks to money, even people who don\u2019t know each other and don\u2019t trust each other can nevertheless cooperate effectively.<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Excerpts from the book of Yuval Noah Harari That spectacular leap from the middle to the top had enormous consequences. Other animals at the top of the pyramid, such as lions and sharks, evolved into that position very gradually, over millions of years. This enabled the ecosystem to develop checks and balances that prevent lions and …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-365","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reads"],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"3.0.2","language":"nl","enabled_languages":["tl","en","nl"],"languages":{"tl":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"en":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"nl":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false}}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/365","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=365"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/365\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":368,"href":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/365\/revisions\/368"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=365"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=365"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onemiguel.es\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=365"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}